15 Cities With the Most Workers Who Sit Versus Stand

Editor’s Notice: This story initially appeared on HireAHelper.

Lately, public well being officers have been making an attempt to lift consciousness of the destructive results of a standard each day exercise: sitting.

Whereas sitting may be useful for resting and sustaining the physique, sitting for extended durations with restricted bodily exercise reduces vitality expenditure and cardiovascular health, which contributes to various adverse health conditions. Sitting can improve the chance of weight problems, blood clots, hypertension, excessive blood sugar, and excessive ldl cholesterol.

It might additionally improve the danger of coronary heart illness, diabetes, and even most cancers. It affects posture, stiffens joints, and contributes to tightness and pressure within the again, hamstrings, and hips. With this lengthy checklist of potential well being penalties, some well being professionals argue that “sitting is the new smoking.”

To find out the areas with the best focus of employees who sit, researchers at HireAHelper used knowledge from O*NET’s Occupation-Level Sitting Score and the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics.

Listed here are the cities with the best focus of employees who sit.

15. Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom, CA

• Composite index: 49.62
• Share of employees in jobs requiring steady sitting: 5.2%
• Share of employees in jobs requiring steady standing: 12.5%
• Whole employees in jobs requiring steady sitting: 51,220
• Whole employees in jobs requiring steady standing: 122,450

14. Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler, AZ

• Composite index: 49.62
• Share of employees in jobs requiring steady sitting: 6.8%
• Share of employees in jobs requiring steady standing: 12.1%
• Whole employees in jobs requiring steady sitting: 143,740
• Whole employees in jobs requiring steady standing: 255,610

13. Los Angeles-Lengthy Seaside-Anaheim, CA

• Composite index: 49.77
• Share of employees in jobs requiring steady sitting: 5.9%
• Share of employees in jobs requiring steady standing: 11.4%
• Whole employees in jobs requiring steady sitting: 337,840
• Whole employees in jobs requiring steady standing: 651,310

12. Baltimore-Columbia-Towson, MD

• Composite index: 49.81
• Share of employees in jobs requiring steady sitting: 5.9%
• Share of employees in jobs requiring steady standing: 11.7%
• Whole employees in jobs requiring steady sitting: 73,510
• Whole employees in jobs requiring steady standing: 146,520

11. Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI

• Composite index: 50.23
• Share of employees in jobs requiring steady sitting: 6.1%
• Share of employees in jobs requiring steady standing: 11.5%
• Whole employees in jobs requiring steady sitting: 111,310
• Whole employees in jobs requiring steady standing: 209,130

10. Denver-Aurora-Lakewood, CO

• Composite index: 50.32
• Share of employees in jobs requiring steady sitting: 6.5%
• Share of employees in jobs requiring steady standing: 12.1%
• Whole employees in jobs requiring steady sitting: 95,220
• Whole employees in jobs requiring steady standing: 177,500

9. Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA

• Composite index: 50.64
• Share of employees in jobs requiring steady sitting: 6.3%
• Share of employees in jobs requiring steady standing: 12.1%
• Whole employees in jobs requiring steady sitting: 120,020
• Whole employees in jobs requiring steady standing: 232,540

8. Hartford-East Hartford-Middletown, CT

• Composite index: 51.03
• Share of employees in jobs requiring steady sitting: 6.5%
• Share of employees in jobs requiring steady standing: 10.0%
• Whole employees in jobs requiring steady sitting: 35,130
• Whole employees in jobs requiring steady standing: 54,370

7. Salt Lake Metropolis, UT

• Composite index: 51.34
• Share of employees in jobs requiring steady sitting: 6.6%
• Share of employees in jobs requiring steady standing: 11.7%
• Whole employees in jobs requiring steady sitting: 49,410
• Whole employees in jobs requiring steady standing: 86,700

6. Austin-Spherical Rock-Georgetown, TX

• Composite index: 51.52
• Share of employees in jobs requiring steady sitting: 6.7%
• Share of employees in jobs requiring steady standing: 12.4%
• Whole employees in jobs requiring steady sitting: 71,840
• Whole employees in jobs requiring steady standing: 132,560

5. New York-Newark-Jersey Metropolis, NY-NJ-PA

• Composite index: 51.67
• Share of employees in jobs requiring steady sitting: 6.6%
• Share of employees in jobs requiring steady standing: 10.5%
• Whole employees in jobs requiring steady sitting: 569,830
• Whole employees in jobs requiring steady standing: 915,440

4. Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH

• Composite index: 51.93
• Share of employees in jobs requiring steady sitting: 6.1%
• Share of employees in jobs requiring steady standing: 10.8%
• Whole employees in jobs requiring steady sitting: 156,970
• Whole employees in jobs requiring steady standing: 278,950

3. San Francisco-Oakland-Berkeley, CA

• Composite index: 52.28
• Share of employees in jobs requiring steady sitting: 7.2%
• Share of employees in jobs requiring steady standing: 10.6%
• Whole employees in jobs requiring steady sitting: 160,430
• Whole employees in jobs requiring steady standing: 236,880

2. Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV

• Composite index: 53.80
• Share of employees in jobs requiring steady sitting: 6.4%
• Share of employees in jobs requiring steady standing: 11.0%
• Whole employees in jobs requiring steady sitting: 186,320
• Whole employees in jobs requiring steady standing: 321,290

1. San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA

• Composite index: 54.02
• Share of employees in jobs requiring steady sitting: 7.5%
• Share of employees in jobs requiring steady standing: 9.2%
• Whole employees in jobs requiring steady sitting: 79,810
• Whole employees in jobs requiring steady standing: 98,760

Methodology

The info used on this evaluation is from O*NET’s Occupation-Level Sitting Score and the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics. To find out the areas with the best focus of employees who sit, researchers calculated a composite index, which is an employment-weighted common of every occupation’s O*NET sitting rating for every location. Within the occasion of a tie, the placement with the better share of employees in jobs requiring steady sitting — these with an O*NET rating of 90 or above — was ranked greater. To enhance relevance, solely metropolitan areas with at the very least 100,000 residents have been included.

Disclosure: The knowledge you learn right here is at all times goal. Nevertheless, we generally obtain compensation once you click on hyperlinks inside our tales.